Negotiating Advantages Change Management - Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Negotiating Advantages Change Management? Answer: Introduction The report is the discussing about the product and food safety. Food safety had become the crucial issues prevailing within the environment. It is deteriorating the health of the people and becoming the cause of various dangerous injuries and health problems. To analyse the problem closely first of all the issues related to food safety have been discussed keeping in mind the specific issue of botulism. In the basic issue the key competitor of the food safety product was analysed along with the advantages and disadvantages based on the weakness and strength of the product. Thereafter the leadership skills and styles were briefly discussed and the suitable leadership theory and style has been selected and the investigation has been made. The third evaluation was in the context of a small case study of Fonterra. The case study was based on the change management model and the change model was chosen to explain the things in better way. Lastly, the qualified bidders list was learnt and po licies were examined to know the factors responsible to get enrolled in The QBL. The entire focus was on the changing scenario of Fonterra and how the human safety has been paid attention. The measures were suggested to improve the situation of health and hygiene in the organisation so that overall development takes place. Based on issue Food safety is the serious and emerging issue prevailing around the world. There are numerous diseases that are up-coming due to lack of food safety and changing food habits of the people. In order to protect people from these hazardous problems and taking steps towards its improvisation is the complex activity. Certain specific issues associated with the product and food safety are botulism, pasture nitrate inhibitor and small pieces of unrecovered plastic on the processing equipment (Food safety, 2017). The basic issue that occurred was the botulism contamination scare in New Zealand by Fonterra. The issue reported was that the company violated four food safety rules and norms. One of them was the recalling of 38t of whey protein. On testing the issues further, results that came up were that the allegation was false. As discussed the 4 issues have been analysed which argues that there was the use of non-standard equipment, the export of contaminated product was taking place, the regulators were not informed about the occurring of discrepancies and even the government was unaware of the fact that contamination has been taking place. Strengths The distribution channel and sales network is strong of Fonterra. The government supported the research and development industry. The profitability and revenue is high and is one of the experienced units. The workforce at Fonterra is highly skilled. Weaknesses The business unit is small. Financial capacity of the company is low. The access towards the capital is less as compared to the supply. The market integration is lacking due to the limited knowledge of in-market value. Advantages and Disadvantages The advantages connected with the particular food safety industry in New Zealand Fonterra industry have developed the healthy perception in the mind of consumers. The by-products of Fonterra have been used wisely thereby creating its own value. The supply chain technology has also been initiated and improvised. The disadvantages attached with the food safety industry are the continuous decline in the wild capture. The not in my backyard (NIMBY) attitude limits the activity of the industries. The fresh exports are curbing due to the reduced cost of airfreight resulting in the lack of feasibility. Leadership theory and style The leadership is the impact of superior over their subordinate and they direct their working and guide the employees to bring about the improvisation in their working and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of working. According to Warren Bennis, leadership is the effort that is made to convert the vision into reality (Antonakis, 2017). It could be best illustrated from the below figure: Leadership theory and style There are 6 leadership theory and style that assists in wisely making the decisions related to the Fonterra. The 6 theories and style are briefly investigated as under: Trait: The traits are inbuilt within the human from the time they are born. They are the instinct and the quality prevailing within them which gets better and exclusive by undergoing the better leadership study. The 5 major traits involved within the human are- intelligence, self-confidence, integrity, sociability and determination. Participative: The participative theory is also quoted as the democratic and power sharing theory. In it the limited power is delegated to the subordinate so that they could undertake certain decisions freely. There are 3 styles of participative leadership- autocratic, democratic and laissez faire. Situational: The situational leaders are those that adjust according to the current or upcoming situations. They are the one that rapidly adopt the dynamic situations and carry the contingency approach. The styles of situational leadership are- selling, telling, participating and delegating. Transactional: The military style leadership is concentrated where the scalar chain is followed. People are motivated in positive as well as negative manner through rewards and punishments. Transformational: The focus is on supporting the staff by accomplishing the vision. The leader sets the high goals and dictates the benchmarks to the staff to gain the dual development simultaneously. Path-goal: It is about the manner in which the leader supports and encourages the staff to perform better in order to accomplish the goals. The aim of the superior is to build up healthy relationship between the employer and the The style of path-goal theory is directive, supportive, participative and achievement-oriented (Frankel PGCMS, 2017). Specific leadership theory and style For Fonterra the situational leadership have been selected which was introduced by Kenneth Blanchard and Paul Hersey. As discussed earlier it is the leadership style where the leader immediately accepts the situation and act accordingly. They handle the situation in a well manner and convert it into the opportunity or at least deal with the situation in such a manner that loss is not been faced by the organisation. The styles of situational leadership will be elucidated briefly with the help of examples: Telling: It could be termed as the micro management. Considering the example of Fonterra products the manager and owner of the company directs the value and nutritional level to be maintained by the employees (Anthony, 2017). Selling: This is meant for the fresher who are still under the process of learning. It seems like the coaching where the employees are made learn about the day to day activities. Participative: It is opted for the sake to analyse the leadership quality of the staff and pick up the point where the person is lacking and focus is paid upon this idea to improve the skills. Delegating: The decision making skills are been tested. After delegating the authority the leader does not bother about the working but the feedback is rendered by him and monitoring is made to note the point where employees are lacking. This could be linked with the Fonterra products where balancing the standards and nutrition is delegated to employees and their decision making is scrutinized (North house, 2015). Change management model The change management model could be better understood with the help of a case study which involve the model of change management. The limitations are also quoted to clarify the model and helps in improving the Food safety issue (Son, 2017). Fonterra is a global dairy which supplies the nutrition throughout the world. The company owns around 10,500 farmers along with the families they own. They believe in the power of diary and nutrition to change the scenario and bring the difference. It is leading dairy in the New Zealand. The company faced the issue in context of the quality of products and the results showed contamination in the dairy products and whey protein concentrate. China and Russia banned the supply of Fonterra along with Malaysia, Vietnam and Sri Lanka. The research have been made and the results stated that out of hundred strains of Clostridium the maximum portion was proved to be healthy and harmless only a few products revealed the involvement of contamination which is likely to cause Botulism which is a life threating disease. But now the search has been made and affected products are identified and recalled and in the other session of processing the bacteria causing the harm has been destroyed. This sce nario highly affected the financial status of the company but it is taking its own way to pave the way towards success. The change management model involves the 3 attributes: Unfreeze- Change- Refreeze. Considering the above case study the Change model has been used which quotes upon the solution of the uncertainty and finding out new ways to perform things and coming up in the lime light once again. With the gradual changes people again start to believe in the quality of product and supports the new method adopted by the company (Mind tools, 2017). The shortcoming faced with the change model: The cultural differences might occur which the other people may not understand. Awareness may not get spreads in equal proportion which might result in the lack of knowledge among the people. A bad change will depict a negative portray of the company which will be harmful for the organisation and countrys reputation (Faucheux, 2017). Quadruple Bottom Line (QBL) The prime responsibility of QBL is to focus on the economic development of the country. The competitiveness is promoted so that profit maximisation could be made for the progress of the nation in the economic term. In the context of the corporate governance the promotion of economic enterprises are its prime responsibility. The quadruple bottom line includes the 4Ps i.e. people, profit, planet and progress and it provides the base for comprehensive framework in order to develop the sustainable prosperity. In context of Fonterra the quadruple bottom line could be explained as under: People: The people are related to the quality of life, now a day people are quality conscious and focuses on the health, wellbeing and flourishing. Therefore the nutrition level and packaging should be done in an effective manner. Fonterra need to maintain its value and concentrate on the fact that not more contaminated bacteria are been supplied to the people. The standard of living has been increased and people are ready to pay for the quality but not to compromise in any case. Profit: The profit in the quadruple bottom line depicts the competitive productivity. The competitive productivity is used of producing the products and services and also distributing the stuff for the consumption and raising the profit thorough the scarce resources. Fonterra in order to increase the profit used whey protein and dairy products but the strains of contaminants causing the botulism highly affected the progress of company. The reputation of company along with country was at risk and it became the prime responsibility of the company to regain the lost fame by incorporating efforts to make a comeback with the variety of nutritional and healthy products and assuring the people about the quality. Planet: The planet refers to the ecosystem and sustainability of the resources. It signifies the social obligation of the organisation towards the community in which they are working. Considering Fonterra the social obligation was broken up due to the spotted strains of clostridium which cause heavy illness and life snatching diseases. On verifying the major portion was found safe but still in the minor portion the contamination was spread. Measures were taken to curb the further production but at once the social obligation was not fulfilled. Earlier Fonterra was one of the top supplier of dairy products because of its quality and retention of nutritional value. Progress: Progress depicts the innovation techniques adopted by the company. It is the point of risk that Fonterra has to take in order to attain the previous reputation and gain back the trust of public with the product and its quality. The new products with high nutritional value and complete check should be launched to achieve the premier position once again (Cambridge leadership development, 2017). Conclusion From the above report it could be concluded that food safety is the major and widely growing issues and dangerous diseases are occurring due to lack of hygiene. The basic issues have been discussed which focuses on the specific issues of botulism caused by the use of Fonterra products. The 3M solution has been briefly discussed along with the strengths and weakness of MPI in relation to the seafood safety. The advantages and disadvantages of MPI safety are investigated. Thereafter the leadership theory and styles are elucidated and the best suiting leadership theory i.e. situational theory and its selling, telling, participative and delegating styles are described. The change management within the food safety has been considered and the case study related to Fonterra is focussed and change model has been linked with it. Lastly, the QBL listing has been briefly discusses along with the certain policies that have to be kept in mind if the company has to get involved in quality bidders list. References 3mnz. (2017). Food safety. Viewed on 4th October 2017. https://www.3mnz.co.nz/3M/en_NZ/food-safety-nz/. Anderson. L. A. (2016). How leadership behaviour affects team members and beyond. Viewed on 6th October 2017. https://blog.beingfirst.com/how-leadership-behavior-affects-team-members-and-beyond. Anthony. L. (2017). Define situational leadership. Viewed on 6th October 2017. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/define-situational-leadership-2976.html. Antonakis, J. (2017).The nature of leadership. Sage publications. Cambridge leadership development. (2017). Quadruple bottom line for sustainable prosperity. Viewed on 10th October 2017. https://cambridgeleadershipdevelopment.com/quadruple-bottom-line-for-sustainable-prosperity/. Food safety. (2017). New Zealand food legislation. Viewed on 4th October 2017. https://www.foodsafety.govt.nz/policy-law/food-regulation/nz-food-legislation/. Faucheux. M. (2017). Negotiating the advantages and disadvantages of change management. viewed on 7th October 2017. https://www.brighthubpm.com/change-management/18477-negotiating-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-change-management/. Frankel, A., PGCMS, R. (2017). What leadership styles should senior nurses develop?Clinical research,4, 24. Mbie. (2017). The investors guide to the New Zealand seafood industry 2017. Viewed on 5th October 2017. https://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/sectors-industries/food-beverage/documents-image-library/folder-2017-investors-guides/investors-guide-to-the-new-zealand-seafood-industry-2017.pdf. Mind Tools. (2017). Lewins change management model. Viewed on 7th October 2017. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_94.htm. Northouse, P. G. (2015).Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications. Quick base. (2012). Three types of change management models. Viewed on 5th October 2017. https://www.quickbase.com/blog/three-types-of-change-management-models. Son. S. (2017). 5 case studies about successful change management. viewed on 5th October 2017. https://www.tinypulse.com/blog/sk-case-studies-successful-change-management.